1.15-
A.The person in this case is interpreting the right claimed as a positive right because he is claiming that he is entitled to he viagra and that the insurance company is suppose to front the money to him for it because they are obligated to. Positive rights are rights that impose an obligation on some people to provide certain things for others. This should be a positive right because the insurance company is obligated to give the money to the man so that he could have a happy sex life.
B. The issue is interpreted as a Negative right because the Legislators have the right to act peacefully without interference, however the organization that ran ads criticizing their voting records interfered with their right to act peacefully. It should be a negative right because the only obligation they impose on others is not to prevent you from acting.
3.9-
I believe that this was illegal for the reasoning that personal information was being invaded and without the consent of the person. It was illegal because the bookseller was saving copies of thousands of emails and analyzed them to collect data on sales trends and the people on the other side of the email messages did not give the bookseller permission to access their mail.
3.10-
The most serious threat in my opinion is the threat of terrorism because CALEA requiring that technology used in communications systems be redesigned, and existing equipment modified, to ensure the ability of law enforcement agencies to interpret communications which could be vulnerable to communism.
No comments:
Post a Comment